Marcus Rashford played a crucial role for Man Utd last season, and his absence would have undoubtedly impacted the team’s performance. His contributions were significant, and he deserved recognition for his efforts.
Football fans often have a reputation for displaying bias towards their favorite clubs. However, as a neutral observer, it’s clear why Man Utd fans might feel a sense of injustice regarding the recent Ballon d’Or nominations.
Marcus Rashford celebrates his goal against Arsenal
In contrast to this, Andre Onana’s impressive performances for Inter last season have earned him a well-deserved place on the 30-man shortlist. Surprisingly, Marcus Rashford, despite his exceptional contributions, has been overlooked in the nominations. Rashford’s 30 goals in Erik ten Hag’s inaugural season as Man Utd manager played a pivotal role in rescuing the team from what could have been a disastrous first year under the Dutchman.
Throughout the season, it was evident that Man Utd was lacking firepower. Despite this, Rashford managed to recalibrate his form and played a crucial role in guiding his club to pivotal victories. Moments like his decisive goal against Manchester City at Old Trafford and his standout performance against Barcelona served as remarkable highlights in the 25-year-old’s season.
Marcus Rashford is still Ten Hag’s irreplaceable striker
However, it appears that the individuals responsible for selecting the Ballon d’Or nominations did not regard Rashford’s contributions as substantial enough. This situation highlights a recurring issue with the award, which revolves around favoring well-established stars over deserving candidates who may not have gained the same level of recognition.
Lionel Messi’s relatively modest season at PSG was somewhat salvaged by his triumph in winning the World Cup with Argentina, securing his place among the Ballon d’Or nominations. Similarly, Liverpool’s Mohamed Salah, despite scoring one goal fewer than Rashford and claiming no silverware last season, has also secured a spot on the list.
Inexplicably, Rashford’s remarkable contributions have been disregarded. Given what he accomplished for Man Utd, it’s entirely reasonable for him to feel aggrieved by the Ballon d’Or committee’s decision. However, this oversight could potentially serve as a blessing in disguise for the Reds.
Rashford can harness the sense of injustice stemming from this decision as motivation for the upcoming campaign. Once again, he finds himself with a point to prove, and it is incumbent upon him to ensure that the panel cannot afford to overlook his exceptional talent when they compile the shortlist in the future.
